기본 콘텐츠로 건너뛰기

Climate Finance Is a Top Story to Watch in 2025

 

Climate Finance Is a Top Story to Watch in 2025

Climate Finance Is a Top Story to Watch in 2025



2025 Is the Year to Care About Finance for Climate and Nature

At last year’s UN climate summit (COP29), wealthy nations agreed for the first time in 15 years to increase the amount of money they provide for climate mitigation and adaptation in developing nations. The new target — $300 billion annually by 2035 — is better than the previous goal of $100 billion a year by 2020. But it’s still a far cry from what’s needed. That’s why leaders from all nations also agreed that all actors should work together to mobilize $1.3 trillion per year by 2035 for the countries most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change.

This $1.3 trillion recognizes the gap between what developing nations can realistically provide domestically for things like clean energy development and climate-smart agriculture, and what will be needed from external sources. It will be extremely difficult to secure the $1.3 trillion. But make no mistake: We must do it.

We know what will happen without adequate climate finance: Resource-strapped communities will suffer the most from increasingly devastating droughts, floods, wildfires and heatwaves, even though they’re least responsible for causing the problem. That’s why delivering the $1.3 trillion isn’t just about finance — it’s about justice.

We also know that without significant emissions reductions from all nations — wealthy and developing alike — the world will not meet its decarbonization goals, exposing everyone to the existential crisis that is climate change. Finance from richer countries to developing ones isn’t charity; it’s an investment in a safer world.

Finally, ambition and finance are two sides of the same coin. You can’t get ambitious nature and climate policies without the finance to execute them. Finance and ambition are a virtuous cycle — and this is the year to unlock both

So let’s dive deep into what’s needed to achieve the $1.3 trillion goal, and what to watch this year to see if it’s coming to fruition. 

1) What’s the Money For?

In short, the $1.3 trillion must support two goals: building resilience in developing nations while also securing their low-carbon growth. 

The effects of climate change are growing ever-more costly and dangerous, but the risks aren’t evenly distributed. Vulnerable nations — those with the fewest resources to respond — are projected to face more than half a trillion dollars in climate-related damages every year by 2030. Meanwhile, finance for building resilience remains paltry, with a $360 billion gap between what’s needed and what’s provided every year. Of the adaptation finance that is flowing, less than one-fifth reaches the communities who need it most.

There is a sizable gap between adaptation needs vs. available finance.

That must change.

At the same time, both low-income and growing nations need support to move beyond fossil fuels while also creating jobs and improving lives. Many low-carbon shifts will come with considerable benefits, such as cleaner air and energy security. But it will take finance to make sure they happen at the speed and scale necessary and in a way that benefits all people — including those employed by the fossil fuel industry. For example, investments in the clean energy sector in developing countries need to increase by around 7 times by 2035, according to the International Energy Agency. 

Answers to a few questions this year will show us whether the world is achieving these twin goals for climate finance:

2) Where Will the Money Come From? 

$1.3 trillion may sound like a lot of money, but not when you put it in perspective: Using the International Monetary Fund’s average annual GDP growth rate of 2.8%, it’s  less than 1% of projected global GDP in 2035.

The $300 billion climate finance target can be met in three ways: bilaterally, where donor countries give directly to recipient nations; multilaterally, through development banks (MDBs) like the World Bank and multilateral climate funds like the Green Climate Fund; and through leveraged private finance. It’s essential that a good chunk of this finance comes in the form of grants, concessional finance and low-cost loans, so as not to add more debt to vulnerable nations, many of whom already face debt distress. Restructuring debt and debt-forgiveness are also important for the $300 billion to make the most impact.

Getting from $300 billion to $1.3 trillion will be much harder, but it is doable if many pieces of the puzzle come together. Capital increases at MDBs, which are very good at turning $1 of taxpayer money into $4-$10, are a good first step. Building on that, taxes on polluting sectors like aviation, maritime shipping or oil could add more than $200 billion. Innovative sources of finance, things like debt-for-nature swaps or carbon markets will be challenging, but essential. And at least half of the $1.3 trillion will need to come from the private sector.

How can we get $1.3T in climate finance for developing countries by 2035?

Progress this year will depend on a few factors:

  • Will member countries increase their funding to the MDBs, despite political headwinds?
  • Will the concept of international taxes gain traction? The International Maritime Organization is considering a carbon levy on shipping, while countries like Kenya, Barbados, France and Brazil have set up a task force to examine potential international taxes.
  • Will leaders use June’s Finance for Development Conference to advance global finance reform and bring together climate, nature and development finance?
  • Will the U.S. government’s new freeze on almost all foreign assistance, including all climate finance, ultimately proceed, and what repercussions will it have?

3) How to Mobilize Private Capital?

Even if experts agree that half of the $1.3 trillion needs to come from private capital, it will be difficult to make this amount  flow to the right places. Low-carbon investments in developing nations are still considered to be risky and expensive. For example, a solar project in Germany would require 8% in equity returns; the same project in Zambia would require 51%. While institutions like the World Bank use financial instruments like guarantees to “de-risk” these investments, they simply cannot be deployed to upwards of $700 billion in private climate finance per year by 2035.

The key, then, is to use smart public policies to unlock the levels of private investment needed.

We’ve seen some examples of this, with China’s green industrial policy, the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act, and India’s expansion of clean energy. India set ambitious renewable energy targets and a clear roadmap, subsidized electric transport and charging infrastructure, invested significant public resources into renewables, and advanced innovative financial instruments like green bonds, all of which boosted the private sector’s confidence in low-carbon investments. These kinds of measures, as well as public-private partnerships, are essential for de-risking investments and attracting private capital.

Signals to watch for this year include:

  • Will we see the emergence of more “country platforms,” country-driven initiatives that aim to align public and private capital behind priority investments that benefit climate and nature? Colombia is the latest country to launch such a platform—will other nations follow suit?
  • Will backlash against ESG initiatives like the Net-Zero Banking Alliance slow climate investments, or will a growing number of national net-zero targets and corporate climate risk disclosure mandates drive green investment?
  • Will we see progress at upcoming conferences like Finance for Development and the Finance in Common Summit? Welcomed outcomes would be a reassessment of how investment risks are calculated, as well as development banks embracing climate- and nature-related investments as their central mission.

4) What Will Fund Nature’s Future?

We can’t fight climate change without safeguarding nature. Trees, healthy soils and the ocean sequester vast amounts of carbon dioxide. Healthy forests regulate rainfall, reduce erosion, provide clean water and support many other ecosystem services. Some estimate that a whopping 55% of global GDP depends on nature.

Nature provides a myriad of benefits for people and nature.

And yet economic incentives continue to drive ecosystem destruction. According to WRI’s Global Forest Watch initiative, the world loses 10 football fields of tropical primary rainforest every minute.

This is where the financial innovation mentioned earlier can play a role. 

Yes, economies currently value nature’s destruction more than its preservation. But creative finance can change that. For example, the proposed Tropical Forest Forever Facility, or TFFF, would pay countries $4 for every hectare of forest conserved while taxing them $400 for every hectare destroyed. Conceived of by the Brazilian government and World Bank, the initiative would use an initial $25 billion from wealthy nations and philanthropies to attract an additional $100 billion in private finance. All investors would see a return after 20 years that’s slightly higher than a government bond.

And that’s just one example. Innovations like land banks, debt-for-nature swaps, carbon  markets — all paired with better policies, standards and regulation — can bring much-needed finance toward nature conservation that’s good for people and the climate.

Areas of progress to watch for this year include:

  • Will the TFFF initiative move from idea to reality?
  • Will national leaders return to the UN biodiversity conference in February and hammer out a global nature finance deal?
  • Will new integrity standards and increasing government support boost investor confidence in high-quality carbon markets?
  • Will debt-for-nature swaps, where wealthy nations and institutions forgive nations’ debt in exchange for conservation, become more common? Ecuador is currently using one-such measure to protect Galapagos National Park, promising to spend $17 million in conservation over the next 18 years in exchange for debt forgiveness.
  • Will more governments redirect harmful agricultural subsidies toward nature-friendly practices, as Denmark and the UK have recently done?

Getting Climate and Nature Finance Flowing

I hope by now I’ve made it clear why mobilizing $1.3 trillion for climate action in developing nations is essential. But it is hardly a done deal. While one element of the $1.3 trillion can leverage and mobilize another, today, the different pieces are governed by entirely different regimes. Getting them to come together as one cohesive puzzle will be hard.

That’s why the biggest thing to watch in 2025 is how the world brings all these components together —especially at key forums like the UN climate summit and G20 meetings. For maximum leverage and efficiency, we need to draw on all sources of finance and make them work together as a system. That will require the deep involvement of finance ministers —and even heads of state — from countries across the world. 

As we step into 2025, it’s clear that our financial systems must be reimagined to tackle climate change, protect nature and improve people’s lives. This transformation won’t be easy, but there are many tools to get us there. By demanding bold steps from our leaders, leveraging limited resources to make maximum impact and harnessing innovation, we have the power to unlock financial flows to some of the world’s most pressing challenges.

Will we see the beginning of this transformation this year? I, for one, will be watching.

2025 Is the Year to Care About Finance for Climate and Nature

At last year’s UN climate summit (COP29), wealthy nations agreed for the first time in 15 years to increase the amount of money they provide for climate mitigation and adaptation in developing nations. The new target — $300 billion annually by 2035 — is better than the previous goal of $100 billion a year by 2020. But it’s still a far cry from what’s needed. That’s why leaders from all nations also agreed that all actors should work together to mobilize $1.3 trillion per year by 2035 for the countries most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change.

This $1.3 trillion recognizes the gap between what developing nations can realistically provide domestically for things like clean energy development and climate-smart agriculture, and what will be needed from external sources. It will be extremely difficult to secure the $1.3 trillion. But make no mistake: We must do it.

We know what will happen without adequate climate finance: Resource-strapped communities will suffer the most from increasingly devastating droughts, floods, wildfires and heatwaves, even though they’re least responsible for causing the problem. That’s why delivering the $1.3 trillion isn’t just about finance — it’s about justice.

We also know that without significant emissions reductions from all nations — wealthy and developing alike — the world will not meet its decarbonization goals, exposing everyone to the existential crisis that is climate change. Finance from richer countries to developing ones isn’t charity; it’s an investment in a safer world.

Finally, ambition and finance are two sides of the same coin. You can’t get ambitious nature and climate policies without the finance to execute them. Finance and ambition are a virtuous cycle — and this is the year to unlock both

So let’s dive deep into what’s needed to achieve the $1.3 trillion goal, and what to watch this year to see if it’s coming to fruition. 

1) What’s the Money For?

In short, the $1.3 trillion must support two goals: building resilience in developing nations while also securing their low-carbon growth. 

The effects of climate change are growing ever-more costly and dangerous, but the risks aren’t evenly distributed. Vulnerable nations — those with the fewest resources to respond — are projected to face more than half a trillion dollars in climate-related damages every year by 2030. Meanwhile, finance for building resilience remains paltry, with a $360 billion gap between what’s needed and what’s provided every year. Of the adaptation finance that is flowing, less than one-fifth reaches the communities who need it most.

There is a sizable gap between adaptation needs vs. available finance.

That must change.

At the same time, both low-income and growing nations need support to move beyond fossil fuels while also creating jobs and improving lives. Many low-carbon shifts will come with considerable benefits, such as cleaner air and energy security. But it will take finance to make sure they happen at the speed and scale necessary and in a way that benefits all people — including those employed by the fossil fuel industry. For example, investments in the clean energy sector in developing countries need to increase by around 7 times by 2035, according to the International Energy Agency. 

Answers to a few questions this year will show us whether the world is achieving these twin goals for climate finance:

2) Where Will the Money Come From? 

$1.3 trillion may sound like a lot of money, but not when you put it in perspective: Using the International Monetary Fund’s average annual GDP growth rate of 2.8%, it’s  less than 1% of projected global GDP in 2035.

The $300 billion climate finance target can be met in three ways: bilaterally, where donor countries give directly to recipient nations; multilaterally, through development banks (MDBs) like the World Bank and multilateral climate funds like the Green Climate Fund; and through leveraged private finance. It’s essential that a good chunk of this finance comes in the form of grants, concessional finance and low-cost loans, so as not to add more debt to vulnerable nations, many of whom already face debt distress. Restructuring debt and debt-forgiveness are also important for the $300 billion to make the most impact.

Getting from $300 billion to $1.3 trillion will be much harder, but it is doable if many pieces of the puzzle come together. Capital increases at MDBs, which are very good at turning $1 of taxpayer money into $4-$10, are a good first step. Building on that, taxes on polluting sectors like aviation, maritime shipping or oil could add more than $200 billion. Innovative sources of finance, things like debt-for-nature swaps or carbon markets will be challenging, but essential. And at least half of the $1.3 trillion will need to come from the private sector.

How can we get $1.3T in climate finance for developing countries by 2035?

Progress this year will depend on a few factors:

  • Will member countries increase their funding to the MDBs, despite political headwinds?
  • Will the concept of international taxes gain traction? The International Maritime Organization is considering a carbon levy on shipping, while countries like Kenya, Barbados, France and Brazil have set up a task force to examine potential international taxes.
  • Will leaders use June’s Finance for Development Conference to advance global finance reform and bring together climate, nature and development finance?
  • Will the U.S. government’s new freeze on almost all foreign assistance, including all climate finance, ultimately proceed, and what repercussions will it have?

3) How to Mobilize Private Capital?

Even if experts agree that half of the $1.3 trillion needs to come from private capital, it will be difficult to make this amount  flow to the right places. Low-carbon investments in developing nations are still considered to be risky and expensive. For example, a solar project in Germany would require 8% in equity returns; the same project in Zambia would require 51%. While institutions like the World Bank use financial instruments like guarantees to “de-risk” these investments, they simply cannot be deployed to upwards of $700 billion in private climate finance per year by 2035.

The key, then, is to use smart public policies to unlock the levels of private investment needed.

We’ve seen some examples of this, with China’s green industrial policy, the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act, and India’s expansion of clean energy. India set ambitious renewable energy targets and a clear roadmap, subsidized electric transport and charging infrastructure, invested significant public resources into renewables, and advanced innovative financial instruments like green bonds, all of which boosted the private sector’s confidence in low-carbon investments. These kinds of measures, as well as public-private partnerships, are essential for de-risking investments and attracting private capital.

Signals to watch for this year include:

  • Will we see the emergence of more “country platforms,” country-driven initiatives that aim to align public and private capital behind priority investments that benefit climate and nature? Colombia is the latest country to launch such a platform—will other nations follow suit?
  • Will backlash against ESG initiatives like the Net-Zero Banking Alliance slow climate investments, or will a growing number of national net-zero targets and corporate climate risk disclosure mandates drive green investment?
  • Will we see progress at upcoming conferences like Finance for Development and the Finance in Common Summit? Welcomed outcomes would be a reassessment of how investment risks are calculated, as well as development banks embracing climate- and nature-related investments as their central mission.

4) What Will Fund Nature’s Future?

We can’t fight climate change without safeguarding nature. Trees, healthy soils and the ocean sequester vast amounts of carbon dioxide. Healthy forests regulate rainfall, reduce erosion, provide clean water and support many other ecosystem services. Some estimate that a whopping 55% of global GDP depends on nature.

Nature provides a myriad of benefits for people and nature.

And yet economic incentives continue to drive ecosystem destruction. According to WRI’s Global Forest Watch initiative, the world loses 10 football fields of tropical primary rainforest every minute.

This is where the financial innovation mentioned earlier can play a role. 

Yes, economies currently value nature’s destruction more than its preservation. But creative finance can change that. For example, the proposed Tropical Forest Forever Facility, or TFFF, would pay countries $4 for every hectare of forest conserved while taxing them $400 for every hectare destroyed. Conceived of by the Brazilian government and World Bank, the initiative would use an initial $25 billion from wealthy nations and philanthropies to attract an additional $100 billion in private finance. All investors would see a return after 20 years that’s slightly higher than a government bond.

And that’s just one example. Innovations like land banks, debt-for-nature swaps, carbon  markets — all paired with better policies, standards and regulation — can bring much-needed finance toward nature conservation that’s good for people and the climate.

Areas of progress to watch for this year include:

  • Will the TFFF initiative move from idea to reality?
  • Will national leaders return to the UN biodiversity conference in February and hammer out a global nature finance deal?
  • Will new integrity standards and increasing government support boost investor confidence in high-quality carbon markets?
  • Will debt-for-nature swaps, where wealthy nations and institutions forgive nations’ debt in exchange for conservation, become more common? Ecuador is currently using one-such measure to protect Galapagos National Park, promising to spend $17 million in conservation over the next 18 years in exchange for debt forgiveness.
  • Will more governments redirect harmful agricultural subsidies toward nature-friendly practices, as Denmark and the UK have recently done?

Getting Climate and Nature Finance Flowing

I hope by now I’ve made it clear why mobilizing $1.3 trillion for climate action in developing nations is essential. But it is hardly a done deal. While one element of the $1.3 trillion can leverage and mobilize another, today, the different pieces are governed by entirely different regimes. Getting them to come together as one cohesive puzzle will be hard.

That’s why the biggest thing to watch in 2025 is how the world brings all these components together —especially at key forums like the UN climate summit and G20 meetings. For maximum leverage and efficiency, we need to draw on all sources of finance and make them work together as a system. That will require the deep involvement of finance ministers —and even heads of state — from countries across the world. 

As we step into 2025, it’s clear that our financial systems must be reimagined to tackle climate change, protect nature and improve people’s lives. This transformation won’t be easy, but there are many tools to get us there. By demanding bold steps from our leaders, leveraging limited resources to make maximum impact and harnessing innovation, we have the power to unlock financial flows to some of the world’s most pressing challenges.

Will we see the beginning of this transformation this year? I, for one, will be watching.

댓글

이 블로그의 인기 게시물

Non-contact exposure to dinotefuran disrupts honey bee homing by altering MagR and Cry2 gene expression

  Non-contact exposure to dinotefuran disrupts honey bee homing by altering  MagR  and  Cry2  gene expression Dinotefuran is known to negatively affect honeybee ( Apis mellifera ) behavior, but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. The magnetoreceptor ( MagR , which responds to magnetic fields) and cryptochrome ( Cry2 , which is sensitive to light) genes are considered to play important roles in honey bees’ homing and localization behaviors. Our study found that dinotefuran, even without direct contact, can act like a magnet, significantly altering  MagR  expression in honeybees. This non-contact exposure reduced the bees’ homing rate. In further experiments, we exposed foragers to light and magnetic fields, the  MagR  gene responded to magnetic fields only in the presence of light, with  Cry 2 playing a key switching role in the magnetic field receptor mechanism ( MagR–Cry2 ). Yeast two-hybrid and BiFc assays confirmed an interactio...

New Report – Interlocked: Midwives and the Climate Crisis

New Report – Interlocked: Midwives and the Climate Crisis Earlier this year, midwives from 41 countries shared their experiences of working in communities affected by climate change through our survey, Midwives’ Experiences and Perspectives on Climate Change. Their voices shaped our new report, Interlocked: Midwives and the Climate Crisis , which highlights how midwives are already responding to the health impacts of climate disasters like floods, wildfires, and extreme heat—and why they must be included in climate action plans. What did we learn?Climate change is damaging community health: 75% of midwives reported that climate change is harming the communities they serve, with rising rates of preterm births, food insecurity, and restricted access to care during disasters like floods. Midwives are critical first responders: Midwives are often the first and only healthcare providers on the ground in crises, delivering care during wildfires, floods, and extreme heat. Midwives face signi...

Bee attack claims life of newspaper distributor

  Bee attack claims life of newspaper distributor Newspaper distributor Pushparaja Shetty (45), who sustained severe injuries in a bee attack, succumbed to his injuries on Thursday at a hospital in Mangaluru. Pushparaja was attacked by a swarm of bees on Wednesday morning while walking at Kenjaru Taangadi under Bajpe town panchayat limits. He was immediately admitted to a hospital for treatment but could not survive the ordeal. Fondly known as ‘Boggu’ in the Porkodi area, Pushparaja was well-known for his dedication to delivering newspapers on foot to every household. He was admired for his generosity, as he often distributed sweets to schoolchildren on Independence Day using his own earnings and contributed part of his income to the betterment of society. Pushparaja was unmarried and is survived by three brothers and one sister.

“Global honey crisis”: Testing technology and local sourcing soars amid fraud and tampering concerns

  “Global honey crisis”: Testing technology and local sourcing soars amid fraud and tampering concerns The World Beekeeping Awards will not grant a prize for honey next year due to the “inability” to thoroughly test honey for adulteration. The announcement comes amid the rise of honey fraud in the EU, where a 2023 investigation found that 46% of 147 honey samples tested were likely contaminated with low-cost plant syrups.  Apimondia, the International Federation of Beekeepers’ Associations, organizes the event at its Congress, whose 49th edition will be held in Copenhagen, Denmark, in September 2025. The conference brings together beekeepers, scientists and other stakeholders. “We will celebrate honey in many ways at the Congress, but honey will no longer be a category, and thus, there will be no honey judging in the World Beekeeping Awards. The lessons learned from Canada 2019 and Chile 2023 were that adequate testing was impossible if we are to award winning honey at the Con...

Unveiling the Canopy's Secrets: New Bee Species Discovered in the Pacific

  Unveiling the Canopy's Secrets: New Bee Species Discovered in the Pacific In an exciting development for environmentalists and beekeeping experts, researchers have discovered eight new species of masked bees in the Pacific Islands, shining a light on the rich biodiversity hidden within the forest canopy. This discovery underscores the critical role bees play in our ecosystems and the pressing need for conservation efforts to protect these vital pollinators. A New Frontier in Bee Research By exploring the forest canopy, scientists have opened a new frontier in bee research, revealing species that have adapted to life high above the ground. These discoveries are crucial for understanding the complex relationships between bees, flora, and the broader ecosystem. The new species of masked bees, characterized by their striking black bodies with yellow or white highlights, particularly on their faces, rely exclusively on the forest canopy for survival. The Importance of Bee Conservation...

Start the New Year Humming Like a Bee

  Start the New Year Humming Like a Bee There are lots of opportunities to be as busy as a bee during these winter holidays. As we hustle toward the dawn of the New Year, it can be hard to notice that the natural world is actually suggesting something different for us right now. We’re past the solstice, but the winter still stretches ahead, the days are still short and the nights long. We’re being invited into a quieter, more inner-focused time. The ancient yogis were all about this inner focus. In India, for example, the Upanishads, the Sanskrit writings that accompanied the development of Hinduism — and alongside it, yoga — beginning around 800 B.C.E., went deeper than earlier texts had into philosophy and questions of being. With the goals of increased inner awareness and higher consciousness, yoga was at that time not yet as focused on the body or on asanas, as it now can tend to be. But the yogis did develop many practices to try to open the way to those goals. They discovered...

The Essential Role of Bees in Our Ecosystem and the Challenges They Face

The Essential Role of Bees in Our Ecosystem and the Challenges They Face Bees have been an integral part of our ecosystem and human agriculture for over four centuries, primarily utilized for their honey in the early days. Now, they are recognized more for their critical role in pollination, which directly impacts a vast majority of the food we consume. Mark Lilly, a prominent beekeeper, emphasizes that without bees' pollination efforts, a significant portion of our diet would be at risk. However, bees face numerous threats, including varroa mites and, in specific regions like West Virginia, black bears. These challenges necessitate concerted efforts for preservation and protection. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: Why are bees so important to the ecosystem? A1: Bees are crucial for pollinating plants, which is necessary for the production of fruits, vegetables, and nuts. Without bees, a large portion of the food we eat would not be available. Q2: What are the main threats to...

The Growing Dilemma of Pet Burials in South Korea: Environmental and Legal Hurdles

The Growing Dilemma of Pet Burials in South Korea: Environmental and Legal Hurdles As the number of pets in South Korea steadily increases, pet owners face a growing dilemma due to the limited number of pet cemeteries across the country. Under the current legal framework, pet remains are classified as household waste, requiring specific disposal methods that are neither convenient nor easily accessible for all citizens. The imbalance between the rising pet population—over 5.52 million households with pets by the end of 2022—and the mere 70 registered pet cemeteries has led to significant challenges. This shortage is particularly evident in regions like Jeju Island, where pet owners must undergo arduous journeys to the mainland to ensure their pets receive proper burials. The root cause of this shortage lies in the strict regulations governing the establishment of pet cemeteries. These facilities, which must include crematoriums, face numerous restrictions, such as proximity to resident...

Climate Crisis Claims Glacier's Vital Climate Data Archive

  Climate Crisis Claims Glacier's Vital Climate Data Archive A recent study published in Nature Geoscience reveals a distressing consequence of global warming: the irreversible loss of valuable climate data stored in alpine glaciers. The research, conducted by a team led by Margit Schwikowski from the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), underscores the alarming rate at which glaciers are melting and highlights the implications for climate research. The study focuses on the Corbassière glacier at Grand Combin in Switzerland, where ice cores drilled in 2018 and 2020 were intended to serve as vital climate archives. However, comparing the two sets of ice cores reveals a grim reality—global warming has rendered the glacier unsuitable as a reliable climate archive. Glaciers, renowned as climate archives, encapsulate valuable information about past climatic conditions and atmospheric compositions. The fluctuating concentrations of trace substances in ice layers provide insights into historica...

German election: Climate and environment take a back seat

  German election: Climate and environment take a back seat When the coalition government comprising the center-left  Social Democratic Party (SPD) ,  Greens  and neoliberal  Free Democratic Party (FDP)  emerged after the last German federal election in the fall of 2021, then-incoming Chancellor  Olaf Scholz  (SPD) did not object to being called the "climate chancellor." That was no surprise: the climate crisis had been a top issue during the election campaign. The new government made the fight against climate change a task for the Economy Ministry and appointed Vice Chancellor  Robert Habeck  from the Greens as its head. Three and a half years later, campaign speeches barely mention climate protection. The dominant issues are how to curb irregular immigration and how to boost Germany's sluggish economy. Skeptical view of renewable energy The head of the center-right  Christian Democratic Union (CDU) ,  Friedrich Merz ...